Proposed: systemtray-spec

Havoc Pennington hp at redhat.com
Sun Aug 8 02:58:10 EEST 2004


On Sun, 2004-08-01 at 06:14, Mike Hearn wrote:
> On Sun, 2004-08-01 at 01:22 -0400, Havoc Pennington wrote:
> > On Fri, 2004-07-30 at 20:11, Daniel Stone wrote:
> > > I'm proposing systemtray-spec with this mail.
> > > 
> > 
> > I vote no, the spec sucks, it's far too policy-free and thus not
> > genuinely interoperable.
> 
> Maybe so but it's useful/necessary for Win32 interop. I don't want to
> see it disappear entirely, even if desktops don't have it enabled by
> default (or only enable it the first time something uses it).

I'm not saying delete it, but it should get fixed before it's written in
stone.

Havoc





More information about the platform mailing list