Time for me to say something
Brad Hards
bhards at bigpond.net.au
Wed Feb 4 09:07:13 EET 2004
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, 4 Feb 2004 15:33 pm, Daniel Stone wrote:
> So, I guess I should say something. The reaction from the KDE side, as
> best I can tell from kde-core-devel archives and various postings/IRC
> messages everywhere, is that more clarification is needed. So, this mail
> is just stepping through and clarifying various stuff, for the time
> being.
- From jdub's talk at LCA:
KDE == cautiously pessamistic?
Gnome == incautiously delerious?
> There also seems to be the impression that the platform is set in stone
> and there's a conspiracy to force stuff on people. It's not. I'm not
> here to dictate[1] - I'm here to consult, first. There are some very
> core items I have decided upon, but the rest is open. The only core
> items I have are xlibs, D-BUS and Cairo.
It might be worth explaining why those things (and also, why not others).
> I also have some questions: where do people feel the relevance in the
> platform lies? Which modules should be in? How often should releases be
> made? et cetera.
I'm thinking that some of the really common libs are also worth packaging,
even if you don't hold them locally. bzlib, libpng, that sort of thing. Given
a kernel, a compiler and libc, get the stuff I'm going to need to build KDE
or Gnome. OK, so it won't be that clear....
Does Gnome have a pre-requisites list? If so, the intersection of that list
and http://www.kde.org/info/requirements/3.2.php is probably a good start.
> OK, so here are the list of proposed modules:
> * xlibs:
> + freedesktop.org xlibs. Forked from XFree86 some time ago, working
> on merging in XFree86 changes between then and the license change.
> Not affected by the license change. Plans to remain with the same
> license. Work underway to trim down the size of codebase, open to
> new enhancements upon request. Recently released 1.0, most major
> distros plan for adoption at some stage.
Just to be clear, does this mean only Xlib? Or other standard X libraries as
well?
Needs a strong maintainer. Who ya got?
> * xserver:
But probably not first time around?
> * D-BUS:
Needed.
> * HAL:
Probably a bit early. Also, what about udev?
> * Cairo:
I liked it too, but it isn't clear where it is going to fit into KDE. Probably
needs to mature - maybe a couple of separate releases?
> * XDG/Startup-Notification/Systray/etc.
> + Various freedesktop.org standards. Every desktop should (and does,
> pretty much) support these.
What does that look like in code terms?
> There are more, which seem to be controversial, so I'll gether them and
> start separate threads. Or, if anyone wants to start *separate* threads
> on scrollkeeper/intltool, please feel free.
Package it separately, call it optional, and tell people to FOAD if they get
too upset by the label.
Other stuff to think about / discuss:
MIME .desktop files?
Freetype?
Fonts?
XML (libxml/libxslt) libs?
OpenGL?
Brad
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFAIJoiGwwszQ/PZzgRAsdQAKCgZutEEvBz0Vuk5XY4Fjr0vs4pgwCeLX93
1QYmpwNuCMRBddKJ2yQVstQ=
=vPIN
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
More information about the platform
mailing list