plymouth performance

[Charlie Brej]

On 17/06/09 05:16, Ray Strode wrote:
>> I have in the past used callgrind and kcachegrind for profiling plymouth,
>> with an added bonus of being able to see how the program behaves on a ~10
>> times slower system.
> Did you find any hot spots?  I should probably do a run with sysprof
> and see where the time is being spent that way.

Attached are the call graphs for the 4 graphical plugins each running for 20 
seconds. The gradient using rand uses quite a lot which could be replaced with a 
dither. I'll take a look.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: charge.ps.gz
Type: application/x-gzip
Size: 5429 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/plymouth/attachments/20090617/0574bf6f/attachment-0004.bin 
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: fade-in.ps.gz
Type: application/x-gzip
Size: 5169 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/plymouth/attachments/20090617/0574bf6f/attachment-0005.bin 
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: solar.ps.gz
Type: application/x-gzip
Size: 3936 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/plymouth/attachments/20090617/0574bf6f/attachment-0006.bin 
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: spinfinity.ps.gz
Type: application/x-gzip
Size: 4709 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/plymouth/attachments/20090617/0574bf6f/attachment-0007.bin