Keyboard input / init + questions

[Jerome Martin]

Ray,

Is the debug logged saved somewhere ? Because with my setup copying it from
the console is going to be tedious...

++

On Sun, Sep 26, 2010 at 10:36 PM, Jerome Martin <tramjoe.merin at gmail.com>wrote:

>
>
> On Sun, Sep 26, 2010 at 10:29 PM, Ray Strode <halfline at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Sun, Sep 26, 2010 at 3:40 PM, Jerome Martin <tramjoe.merin at gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>> > 1) I upgraded to git version, still no luck with the keyboard messup
>> with
>> > init (from sysvinit debian squeeze) when it starts the rc2.d after rcS
>> > execution.
>> Can you post a log booted with plymouth:debug ?
>>
>
> Mmmh, I'll try to get that setup back online and do that ASAP.
>
>
>>
>> [..snip..]
>> > And the patches themselves in attached file...
>> Most of these changes are script specific, so I'll leave this stuff
>> for Charlie to respond to.
>>
>
> OK.
>
>
>>
>> > the current git version certainly deserves a
>> > proper release and some documentation though ...
>> Right, I was going to do some logging changes before doing a 0.8.4
>> release, but maybe i'll do those changes after the release.
>>
>> Documentation is something very much lacking in plymouth.  I want to
>> rectify that before 1.0.
>>
>
> <nod>
>
>
>>
>> > 5) As a sidenote, I did a quick debian packaging of the git version, but
>> had
>> > to adapt a bit the debian package rules from squeeze because it assumed
>> that
>> > plymouth original sources already had autoconf ran there, when those
>> that I
>> > downloaded had an autogen.sh script ... This is weird, and it is either
>> an
>> > unclean package in debian OR the fact that you released last time with
>> > autogen.sh already ran. Is that the case ?
>> the autogoo model is a little weird here.  The version of the source
>> in the tarball contains generated files that aren't checked into
>> version control.  When making a release, I do
>>
>> "make distcheck"
>>
>> which creates the tarball and adds the generated files to the tarball.
>>  If you're just building a snapshot you can do:
>>
>> "make dist"
>>
>> which does the same thing but skips a bunch of checks and a test
>> compile that take a lot of time.
>>
>
> Mmmhh. But against which makefile ? You need to generate it first don't you
> ?
> So the release from git tree would be ./autogen.sh; ./configure OPTIONS and
> then your make distcheck ?
>
> Best,
> --
> Jérôme Martin
>



-- 
Jérôme Martin
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/plymouth/attachments/20100926/8f3de92a/attachment.htm>