[Pm-utils] Some thoughts about some of the hooks

Holger Macht hmacht at suse.de
Wed Oct 11 01:17:33 PDT 2006

On Tue 10. Oct - 19:50:17, Peter Jones wrote:
> On Thu, 2006-10-05 at 18:50 +0200, Stefan Seyfried wrote:
> > 10NetworkManager
> > - should be in NM package
> > - shouldn't the "session daemons" actually do this? Send a "going to suspend"
> >   signal which NM (and others) will listen to?
> No -- Using NM does not imply that you're using a graphical setup, which
> is generally where those session daemons come from.

A root session, also without graphical setup is still a session and you
need something there anyway to care about pm policy. So I also think that
the policy decision makers should send NetworkManager to sleep and awake


More information about the Pm-utils mailing list