[Pm-utils] Re: Newer version of pm-utils?

David Zeuthen david at fubar.dk
Wed Feb 7 12:18:27 PST 2007

On Wed, 2007-02-07 at 20:13 +0100, Stefan Seyfried wrote:
> Weren't there plans to let HAL pass these hacks down in environment
> variables or commandline options to pm-suspend? This would be much easier
> IMO.

I think that was the plan. I don't feel good about making pm-utils
depend hal; we really need hal to pass the options down e.g.

 pm-suspend --quirk-foo --quirk-bar

That's just a lot cleaner.


More information about the Pm-utils mailing list