[Pm-utils] Re: Resume via quirks, not using the DBUS method,
Was: Release Candidates ?
seife at suse.de
Tue Feb 20 12:30:08 PST 2007
On Tue, Feb 20, 2007 at 03:19:50PM -0500, Peter Jones wrote:
> On Tue, 2007-02-20 at 19:27 +0000, Richard Hughes wrote:
> > On Tue, 2007-02-20 at 13:01 -0500, Peter Jones wrote:
> > > + echo " --quirk-dpms-on"
> > > + echo " --quirk-dpms-suspend"
> > > + echo " --quirk-radeon-off"
> > > + echo " --quirk-s3-bios"
> > > + echo " --quirk-s3-mode"
> > > + echo " --quirk-vbe-post"
> > > + echo " --quirk-vbemode-restore"
> > > + echo " --quirk-vbestate-restore"
> > > + echo " --quirk-vga-mode3"
> > Looks good, but I think remove the quirk-* prefix and also rename it to
> > 99video like Stefan suggested.
> David and I were talking about the quirk- thing on irc, and decided to
> leave it in. It doesn't hurt anything, and it makes them sort into one
> block in e.g. the "--help" output.
I don't mind the "--quirk" stuff, since i need to translate it into s2ram
options anyway, so that's fine with me.
> Anyway, there's a pre-release at
Before getting towards 1.0, shouldn't we move over from /etc/ to
/usr/lib/pm-utils or something like that to be FHS compliant? Somebody
mentioned recently to me that having these scripts in /etc/pm/hooks seemed
a bit strange to him. I am not very good at that FHS stuff, but IIUC only
configuration stuff should live in /etc?
"Any ideas, John?"
"Well, surrounding them's out."
More information about the Pm-utils