[Pm-utils] Re: Resume via quirks, not using the DBUS method,
Was: Release Candidates ?
david at fubar.dk
Tue Feb 20 14:31:30 PST 2007
On Tue, 2007-02-20 at 21:01 +0000, Richard Hughes wrote:
> On Tue, 2007-02-20 at 21:30 +0100, Stefan Seyfried wrote:
> > Before getting towards 1.0, shouldn't we move over from /etc/ to
> > /usr/lib/pm-utils or something like that to be FHS compliant? Somebody
> > mentioned recently to me that having these scripts in /etc/pm/hooks
> > seemed
> > a bit strange to him. I am not very good at that FHS stuff, but IIUC
> > only
> > configuration stuff should live in /etc?
> Yes, stuff that's not a configuration option should not be in /etc -
> also, I would really like to rename hooks into sleep.d or power.d to
> signify that scripts can just be dumped there.
Reading the FHS I think we should use both. I think the way it works is
that pm-utils + packages should use /usr/lib/pm-utils/pm/. System
administrators and end users then use /etc/pm/. That's at least how HAL
works wrt. fdi files.
More information about the Pm-utils