[Pm-utils] Userspace suspend support for pm-utils

[Tim Dijkstra]

On Fri, 8 Jun 2007 14:51:52 +0200
Tim Dijkstra <newsuser at famdijkstra.org> wrote:

> On Fri, 08 Jun 2007 11:19:19 +0100
> Richard Hughes <hughsient at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> > On Fri, 2007-06-08 at 12:17 +0200, Stefan Seyfried wrote:
> > > Good, so we can use that. Does it get passed down to pm-utils or do i
> > > need to jump through hoops to get it? 
> > 
> > Good question. I don't think it get passed down - I'm crazy busy today -
> > could someone do a HAL patch for this please - thanks.
> 
> OK, this will set --quirk-none to the exported quirks in case of a
> machine confirmed to be working without quirks. Please apply.

OK, now we have this. We have to think how we want to use it. s2ram
always refused to suspend if a machine wasn't in the white list. Now we
have --quirks-none we can do the same in pm-utils.

We can maybe teach hal to notice this and tell g-p-m that suspending
didn't succeed. g-p-m could then tell the user to go and find out what
quirks are needed.

Do we agree about that?

grts Tim
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/pm-utils/attachments/20070618/ea1df3de/attachment.pgp