[Pm-utils] Userspace suspend support for pm-utils

[Tim Dijkstra]

On Sat, 23 Jun 2007 20:57:58 +0100
Richard Hughes <hughsient at gmail.com> wrote:

> On Mon, 2007-06-18 at 22:54 +0200, Tim Dijkstra wrote:
> > On Fri, 8 Jun 2007 14:51:52 +0200
> > Tim Dijkstra <newsuser at famdijkstra.org> wrote:
> > > OK, this will set --quirk-none to the exported quirks in case of a
> > > machine confirmed to be working without quirks. Please apply.
> > 
> > OK, now we have this. We have to think how we want to use it. s2ram
> > always refused to suspend if a machine wasn't in the white list. Now we
> > have --quirks-none we can do the same in pm-utils.
> 
> Well, I think refusing to suspend is a bit harsh, but I understand why.
> 
> > We can maybe teach hal to notice this and tell g-p-m that suspending
> > didn't succeed. g-p-m could then tell the user to go and find out what
> > quirks are needed.
> 
> In RHEL 5 g-pm we query HAL for the suspend failure, maybe we can review
> this again for upstream?

Sorry, I don't understand. What do you precisely do?

grts Tim
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/pm-utils/attachments/20070623/9a88d3d0/attachment.pgp