[Pm-utils] Re: Resume via quirks, not using the DBUS method, Was: Release Candidates ?

[Tim Dijkstra]

On Fri, 9 Mar 2007 16:47:31 +0100
Stefan Seyfried <seife at suse.de> wrote:

> On Tue, Mar 06, 2007 at 12:51:48PM -0500, Peter Jones wrote:
> > On Tue, 2007-03-06 at 18:23 +0100, Michael Biebl wrote:
> > > 2007/3/6, Peter Jones <pjones at redhat.com>:
> > > >
> > > > I find myself wondering if /etc/pm/config shouldn't really
> > > > be /usr/lib/pm-utils/config , actually.  That would make /etc/pm
> > > > entirely the domain of the admin (and any ISV software he adds)
> > > 
> > > Imo putting config files in /usr/lib/ is a bad idea. No one expects
> > > them in /usr/lib, Debian policies forbid it and I also think the FHS
> > > does not promote this.
> > 
> > But that's the point -- they're not config files, they're system
> > scripts.  *All* of the behavior can be configured through the files
> > under /etc/pm/ .  Really the file named "config" is more like "default
> > configuration".
> 
> #!/bin/sh
> #######################################################
> # DO NOT EDIT THIS FILE, edit /etc/pm/config instead! #
> #######################################################

For the debian this won't be good enough, everything under /etc is the
domain of the administrator. But you can of course argue that is out
problem;)

grts Tim