[Pm-utils] Re: pm-utils' 55battery: WTF?

[Peter Jones]

On Tue, 2007-03-13 at 14:45 -0400, David Zeuthen wrote:

> It tells HAL to rescan the battery - in case someone changed the battery
> we want the new serial number etc... if I recall Peter's reasoning
> correctly. I think this check is better done in HAL than in pm-utils; it
> doesn't make sense to make pm-utils call into HAL at all - Peter, is
> this fine with you? 
> 
> If so, I'll make this change in HAL for 0.5.9 (and I'll make the async
> too!).

Sure, this can (and should) be in HAL.  I'll remove it just as soon as I
can verify that the fixed HAL works.

-- 
  Peter