[Pm-utils] Re: pm-utils' 55battery: WTF?

Peter Jones pjones at redhat.com
Wed Mar 14 09:05:50 PDT 2007

On Wed, 2007-03-14 at 13:56 +0100, Olivier Blin wrote:
> David Zeuthen <david at fubar.dk> writes:
> > It tells HAL to rescan the battery - in case someone changed the battery
> > we want the new serial number etc... if I recall Peter's reasoning
> > correctly. I think this check is better done in HAL than in pm-utils; it
> > doesn't make sense to make pm-utils call into HAL at all - Peter, is
> > this fine with you? 
> But what if pm-hibernate is run directly from command line and not
> from hal-system-power-hibernate-linux ?
> Or do you forget about command line users in pm-utils?

Yeah, that's certainly a valid point.  I think that we really should be
(as bizarre as it seems) telling HAL when we're suspending and when
we're resuming.

David, what do you think about this?


More information about the Pm-utils mailing list