[Pm-utils] [PATCH 5/8] pm-utils 1.2.3 proposed patches
rw at rlworkman.net
Sat Nov 29 16:28:25 PST 2008
On Sat, 29 Nov 2008 08:51:29 -0800 (PST)
Victor Lowther <victor.lowther at gmail.com> wrote:
> 90clock takes over a second to run on suspend.
> Most systems do not need it. Add NEED_CLOCK_SYNC, and only run
> hwclock if it is set. This should eventually turn into a quirk.
Any idea which systems currently *do* need this? I'm assuming that the
proper way to handle this in the future is patches to hal-info, but I'm
curious for the time being: can we expect a *lot* of bug reports if we
remove this from our 1.2.x package? IOW, how much of a minority are
the systems which actually need this hook?
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/pm-utils/attachments/20081129/a16d0451/attachment.pgp
More information about the Pm-utils