[Pm-utils] RFC - PATCH to functions.in to support Slackware init

[Stefan Seyfried]

Dan Nicholson wrote:

> service is not LSB. It's just a wrapper that makes initializing

ok. I actually managed to avoid reading that spec until now ;)

> Robby's point about ambiguous service names is valid, though. Right
> now, we only call stopservice() for ntpd, but it could be called ntp
> or nettime or anything else since there's no convention for that.

But then, the hook that calls stopservice belongs in the ntpd package and not
in pm-utils anyway. And again, the packager of the to-be-stopped service knows
how his init script is named.
-- 
Stefan Seyfried
R&D Team Mobile Devices            |              "Any ideas, John?"
SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Nürnberg | "Well, surrounding them's out."

This footer brought to you by insane German lawmakers:
SUSE Linux Products GmbH, GF: Markus Rex, HRB 16746 (AG Nürnberg)