[PATCH v3 1/4] change mozjs interface module to c++

[Colin Walters]

On Mon, Dec 12, 2016, at 11:08 AM, Jeremy Linton wrote:
>
> Yes, moving forward to mozjs24 remains a good medium term plan. Primary 
> because js 1.8.5 and mozjs17 need to go. 

I suspect the gjs -> mozj24 dependency has driven it into most distributions now,
and what gjs does (and for that matter other mozjs tools like libproxy)
should probably be looked at.

In the short term I think hard requiring mozjs24 in the next release is probably OK.
I pushed your patches to master, though I tweaked the subject
of the porting one to make it "Switch to hard requiring mozjs24" since
I think it's clearer.

Thanks for the work on this!