<html> <head> <base href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/" /> </head> <body> <div> <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_REOPENED " title="REOPENED - top of the map is not rendered correctly" href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=94371#c6">Comment # 6</a> on <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_REOPENED " title="REOPENED - top of the map is not rendered correctly" href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=94371">bug 94371</a> from <a class="email" href="mailto:Thomas.Freitag@alfa.de" title="Thomas Freitag <Thomas.Freitag@alfa.de>"> Thomas Freitag</a> <pre>(In reply to Albert Astals Cid from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=94371#c4">comment #4</a>) > Thomas I did read the regression run incorrectly and the patch does actually > introduce a regression, this pdf that was previously rendered correctly is > now a black box. > > Can you have a look? Who ever had this idea to scale image data just in case of jpx streams to 8 bit values but then treat index values in the reading function? This prevents a clean solution, in my eyes every solution looks like a dirty hack... And because getImageParams() is called so early which already reads the jpx data and scales it I even have not yet the Gfx colorspace which is parsed later.</pre> </div> <hr> You are receiving this mail because: <ul> <li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li> </ul> </body> </html>