<html>
<head>
<base href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/" />
</head>
<body>
<p>
<div>
<b><a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_NEW "
title="NEW - Poppler can't display transparent JPEG 2000 images"
href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=93468#c2">Comment # 2</a>
on <a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_NEW "
title="NEW - Poppler can't display transparent JPEG 2000 images"
href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=93468">bug 93468</a>
from <span class="vcard"><a class="email" href="mailto:Thomas.Freitag@alfa.de" title="Thomas Freitag <Thomas.Freitag@alfa.de>"> <span class="fn">Thomas Freitag</span></a>
</span></b>
<pre>Mmmh, Tristan, image 2 and 3 contain an alpha channel and are therefore not
handled correctly by poppler. BUT: where in case of image 1 an image object and
a corresponding smask is set in the PDF and so the transparency remains, the
parameter SMaskInData is not set for image 2 and 3. The PDF spec says that in
this case the alpha channel in the jpx encoded data should be ignored (Default:
SMaskInData = 0).
So these images will remain non-transparent and look like image 5.
I will upload a patch that handles SMaskInData = 0 correctly but still will not
display correctly if SMaskInData is 1 or 2. This would mean more effort also in
the output devices to handle that correctly, so I will not implement that
before I get some good examples.</pre>
</div>
</p>
<hr>
<span>You are receiving this mail because:</span>
<ul>
<li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li>
</ul>
</body>
</html>