<html> <head> <base href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/" /> </head> <body> <div> <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW - Scale-to arguments not working in some cases" href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=94655#c3">Comment # 3</a> on <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW - Scale-to arguments not working in some cases" href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=94655">bug 94655</a> from <a class="email" href="mailto:carlosgc@gnome.org" title="Carlos Garcia Campos <carlosgc@gnome.org>"> Carlos Garcia Campos</a> <pre>(In reply to Jason Crain from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=94655#c2">comment #2</a>) > I realized that pdftoppm's behavior is different. Running "pdftoppm -png > -scale-to-x 300 -scale-to-y 800 ..." on this PDF will make a 800x300 result > because of internal rotation. Does anyone else consider that correct? I'd > prefer it to make a 300x800 image regardless of rotation. I don't know, but I think it's important that tools having the same arguments are consistent to each other. So, I think we can file a new bug report to discuss this.</pre> </div> <hr> You are receiving this mail because: <ul> <li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li> </ul> </body> </html>