<html>
<head>
<base href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/">
</head>
<body>
<p>
<div>
<b><a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_NEW "
title="NEW - return dates in UTC format"
href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=94173#c24">Comment # 24</a>
on <a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_NEW "
title="NEW - return dates in UTC format"
href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=94173">bug 94173</a>
from <span class="vcard"><a class="email" href="mailto:jakubkucharski97@gmail.com" title="Jakub Kucharski <jakubkucharski97@gmail.com>"> <span class="fn">Jakub Kucharski</span></a>
</span></b>
<pre>(In reply to Albert Astals Cid from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=94173#c22">comment #22</a>)
<span class="quote">> Ok, so I guess you have convinced me, let's give Jakub some time to comment
> about what he thinks of the patches.</span >
Sorry, I've been quiet occupied recently.
I'd prefer if the code of poppler_date_parse() was somehow moved to core and
used by glib and cpp, because now it does the same thing as
detail::convert_date from cpp. This way we could avoid doubling the effort put
into fixing/changing the way time conversion works. I think these two functions
should stay (especially since one (overloaded) version of convert_date is
exported as public API), but they should call a function from core which would
do all the work. But this is of course open for discussion.
Other than that, everything seems ok to me.</pre>
</div>
</p>
<hr>
<span>You are receiving this mail because:</span>
<ul>
<li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li>
</ul>
</body>
</html>