<html>
<head>
<base href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/">
</head>
<body>
<p>
<div>
<b><a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_NEW "
title="NEW - Cannot render a particular PDF document"
href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=97183#c5">Comment # 5</a>
on <a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_NEW "
title="NEW - Cannot render a particular PDF document"
href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=97183">bug 97183</a>
from <span class="vcard"><a class="email" href="mailto:a.radke@arcor.de" title="a.radke@arcor.de">a.radke@arcor.de</a>
</span></b>
<pre>Arch usually won't switch to use openjpeg2 until upstream recommends it as the
preferred/recommended and better tested library. I see Fedora and Debian using
openjpeg2 in their latest branches.
Is openjpeg2 now recommended by the poppler devs? Some answer to the question
on the mailing list would be nice:
<a href="https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/poppler/2016-July/011899.html">https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/poppler/2016-July/011899.html</a>
If this is a bug in libopenjpeg(1) I doubt it will ever get fixed.</pre>
</div>
</p>
<hr>
<span>You are receiving this mail because:</span>
<ul>
<li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li>
</ul>
</body>
</html>