<html> <head> <base href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/"> </head> <body> <div> <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_RESOLVED bz_closed" title="RESOLVED FIXED - Embedded TrueType Symbols with accents not rendered correctly" href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=101855#c20">Comment # 20</a> on <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_RESOLVED bz_closed" title="RESOLVED FIXED - Embedded TrueType Symbols with accents not rendered correctly" href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=101855">bug 101855</a> from <a class="email" href="mailto:Thomas.Freitag@alfa.de" title="Thomas Freitag <Thomas.Freitag@alfa.de>"> Thomas Freitag</a> <pre>(In reply to Albert Astals Cid from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=101855#c18">comment #18</a>) > Honestly, have i ever rejected a patch that improved inter-operability with > Acrobat? > > I don't think so, i'm juts trying to make sure we do things because we > understand why we do them and not because "i just swiched a bit and suddenly > looks better", because sometimes down the road those changes have problems. > > I'll run the regtest. Sorry for any misunderstanding, Albert. To clearify in other words: I never had argued for my patch if "i just switched a bit and suddenly looks better". I argued for it because I became convinced that acrobat always starts with the unicode cmap if it exists, regardless of whether the spec says that or not. To the contrary: in all the last years when I provided patches to poppler I was happy that You are there as my counterpart who try to get to the bottom of it. This often made my patches better and when I was on the wrong track You guided me back.</pre> </div> <hr> You are receiving this mail because: <ul> <li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li> </ul> </body> </html>