<html>
<head>
<base href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/">
</head>
<body>
<p>
<div>
<b><a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_RESOLVED bz_closed"
title="RESOLVED INVALID - test-render-to-file.cpp"
href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=100552#c8">Comment # 8</a>
on <a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_RESOLVED bz_closed"
title="RESOLVED INVALID - test-render-to-file.cpp"
href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=100552">bug 100552</a>
from <span class="vcard"><a class="email" href="mailto:aacid@kde.org" title="Albert Astals Cid <aacid@kde.org>"> <span class="fn">Albert Astals Cid</span></a>
</span></b>
<pre>(In reply to Gwenaël Cléon from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=100552#c6">comment #6</a>)
<span class="quote">> Could you please be a little bit less agressive !
>
> For example in the header poppler-qt5.h we can see :
>
> #include <QtCore/QDateTime>
>
> and the Qt documentation *clearly* states that the header for QDateTime is
> #include <QDateTime></span >
I can change it if it makes you happier.
<span class="quote">>
> So can you please explain that to me, as I am just a fool and you understood
> everything ?</span >
Maybe?
<span class="quote">> <a href="http://doc.qt.io/qt-5/search-results.html?q=QDateTime">http://doc.qt.io/qt-5/search-results.html?q=QDateTime</a></span >
Once upon a time Qt recommended to use the Module/Class include, then they
realized it was a stupid idea because it mean if they changed Class from
ModuleA to ModuleB things would stop compiling so stopped recommending the
Module/Class include in favour to just Class include. But both are correct and
work, if it doesn't work it means the build system is wrongly set and it needs
to be fixed there, but people keep sending the wrong patch, and then they
complain because i tell them the patch is wrong.</pre>
</div>
</p>
<hr>
<span>You are receiving this mail because:</span>
<ul>
<li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li>
</ul>
</body>
</html>