<html> <head> <base href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/"> </head> <body> <div> <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW - [PATCH] Form and annotation borders are not drawn when field /S is not present in /BS" href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=102640#c7">Comment # 7</a> on <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW - [PATCH] Form and annotation borders are not drawn when field /S is not present in /BS" href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=102640">bug 102640</a> from <a class="email" href="mailto:andrew.chuanye.chen@gmail.com" title="Andrew Chen <andrew.chuanye.chen@gmail.com>"> Andrew Chen</a> <pre>Created <a href="attachment.cgi?id=134284" name="attach_134284" title="acrobat-screenshot.png">attachment 134284</a> <a href="attachment.cgi?id=134284&action=edit" title="acrobat-screenshot.png">[details]</a> acrobat-screenshot.png Interestingly enough, adobe acrobat just ignores /Border when /BS is present, so it draws a 1px border. The pdf specs allows /Border to be ignored in favor of /BS. I don't consider this to be a regression, rather the original implementation is bugged. In fact the original implementation also ignored /Border, it just assumed there is no border because /W is missing in /BS, instead of using the default value of a 1px border. Snippet from pdf file: > /A << > /S /URI > /URI (<a href="http://www.ti.com/wireless">http://www.ti.com/wireless</a>) > >> > /BS << > /Type /Border > >> > /Border [ > 0 > 0 > 0 > ]</pre> </div> <hr> You are receiving this mail because: <ul> <li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li> </ul> </body> </html>