<html> <head> <base href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/"> </head> <body> <div> <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW - [PATCH] Form and annotation borders are not drawn when field /S is not present in /BS" href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=102640#c9">Comment # 9</a> on <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW - [PATCH] Form and annotation borders are not drawn when field /S is not present in /BS" href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=102640">bug 102640</a> from <a class="email" href="mailto:andrew.chuanye.chen@gmail.com" title="Andrew Chen <andrew.chuanye.chen@gmail.com>"> Andrew Chen</a> <pre>I apologize if my previous comment has offended you. The reason I don't want to call it a regression is because I don't see any definitive standard we can adhere to in this case. So it is worth discussing this instead of blindly following what the original behavior is. I can see two possible courses of action: 1. Follow acrobat: ignore /Border when /BS is present. This leads to a (default) 1px border rendered in your pdf. 2. Preferentially use values from /BS but also use values from /Border if the corresponding values are not present in /BS. This would cause no border to be rendered in your pdf. The second one seems like the more logical thing to do but the first option makes for better compatibility. I personally think maintaining compatibility with acrobat is the better option, but I can also see why it would be a good idea to just try make the most sense of of the pdf.</pre> </div> <hr> You are receiving this mail because: <ul> <li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li> </ul> </body> </html>