<html>
<head>
<base href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/">
</head>
<body>
<p>
<div>
<b><a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_NEW "
title="NEW - add API to create PopplerDocument from FD"
href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=107599#c1">Comment # 1</a>
on <a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_NEW "
title="NEW - add API to create PopplerDocument from FD"
href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=107599">bug 107599</a>
from <span class="vcard"><a class="email" href="mailto:aacid@kde.org" title="Albert Astals Cid <aacid@kde.org>"> <span class="fn">Albert Astals Cid</span></a>
</span></b>
<pre>I'm really not happy when we get workarounds in our code because we collide
with other repos type names, why should we be the ones adding workarounds and
not the other codes?
Also it's much easier for me if you split the patches that are not glib based
since i can review and land those but i don't have enough knowledge to review
glib/ stuff so if you put glib and not glib stuff together in a patch i can't
help</pre>
</div>
</p>
<hr>
<span>You are receiving this mail because:</span>
<ul>
<li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li>
</ul>
</body>
</html>