[poppler] Win32 portability
Brad Hards
bradh at frogmouth.net
Sat Jun 3 18:37:50 PDT 2006
On Sunday 04 June 2006 07:48, Krzysztof Kowalczyk wrote:
> Is there interest among poppler developers to maintain win32 portability?
Opinions probably vary, but I would like to see portability maintained. Of
course, the portability comes at some cost, and if the code becomes
unmaintainable, then that isn't helping anyone. However for kpdf/okular, we
do need win32 support for KDE4.
> I just started working on a PDF viewer for Windows
> (http://blog.kowalczyk.info/software/sumatrapdf). Initially I used
> xpdf but just ported it to poppler and would much rather stick with
> poppler since it has more open and more active development so that I
> can benefit from fixes made to poppler and others can benefit from
> fixes that I make.
Sounds good.
> I would be happy to maintain win32 portability. I've opened a bug and
> attached a patch to bring the latest cvs version of poppler to compile
> on Windows under Visual Studio 2005
> (https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7107).
Hmmm, not sure who the best person is to review this.
krh?
> Is that the best way to submit patches in order to get them into main
> tree or should I use some other way (e.g. send the patches to mailing
> list)?
Probably both.
Brad
More information about the poppler
mailing list