[poppler] Switching source control tools.
Jeff Muizelaar
jeff at infidigm.net
Sat Apr 28 21:40:03 PDT 2007
On Sun, Apr 29, 2007 at 09:45:45AM +1000, Brad Hards wrote:
> On Sunday 29 April 2007 00:07, Jeff Muizelaar wrote:
> > > How about svn and svk. Or svn with local git tools. You can get what you
> > > want, and I can get what I want.
> >
> > What are your reasons for wanting svn?
> Familiarity. Proven reliability. Good documentation.
I could say the same about git for the first two. I have no idea how the
quality of the documentation compares. If had to guess, I'd guess that
svn's is probably better.
> I can live with git (either through a GUI, if there is one), or I'll write
> some scripts that do update and commit. I'd just prefer svn.
There a couple of gui's: git-gui, qgit, giggle. I have no idea how good
any of them are though.
> I'm just interested in why did you bother to ask what kind of revision control
> system people wanted if git is the only answer you are willing to accept?
git is the only answer I wanted. However, if Albert wasn't interested in
using git then I'd have to accept a switch to svn.
-Jeff
More information about the poppler
mailing list