[poppler] unit test for GLib bindings

Sat Apr 25 03:51:28 PDT 2009

Hi,

In <1240653388.4223.4.camel at charmaleon>
  "Re: [poppler] unit test for GLib bindings" on Sat, 25 Apr 2009 11:56:28 +0200,
  Carlos Garcia Campos <carlosgc at gnome.org> wrote:

> $ CUTTER_DEBUG=yes glib/test/run-test.sh
> GNU gdb 6.8-debian
> Copyright (C) 2008 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
> License GPLv3+: GNU GPL version 3 or later <http://gnu.org/licenses/gpl.html>
> This is free software: you are free to change and redistribute it.
> There is NO WARRANTY, to the extent permitted by law.  Type "show copying"
> and "show warranty" for details.
> This GDB was configured as "i486-linux-gnu"...
> (gdb) r
> Starting program: /home/carlos/gnome-cvs/bin/cutter --keep-opening-modules --verbose=verbose -s glib/test --exclude-directory lib --exclude-directory fixtures glib/test
> [Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled]
> [New Thread 0xb7b2e6c0 (LWP 4786)]
> test-layer:
>   test_nested:						.: (0.157269)
>   test_title:						.: (0.041168)
>   test_visible:						.: (0.001041)
> test-form-field:
>   test_multi_line_text:					.: (0.019235)
>   test_combo_choice:					.: (0.003372)
>   test_list_choice:					.: (0.003441)
>   test_check_button:					.: (0.002642)
>   test_radio_button:					.: (0.002585)
>   test_general:						.: (0.007316)
>   test_normal_text:					.: (0.002999)
>   test_file_select_text:				.: (0.002970)
>   test_push_button:					.: (0.004597)
>   test_normal_password_text:				.: (0.003065)
> test-page:
>   test_index_multi_pages:				.: (0.000808)
>   test_get_size:					.: (0.000602)
>   test_render_pixbuf:					.: (0.034766)
>   test_transition:					.: (0.000963)
>   test_index_single_page:				.: (0.000533)
>   test_get_form_field_mapping:				.: (0.006280)
>   test_get_text:					.: (0.045406)
> test-document:
>   test_attachment:					
> Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
> [Switching to Thread 0xb7b2e6c0 (LWP 4786)]
> 0xb7dd8613 in strlen () from /lib/tls/i686/cmov/libc.so.6
> (gdb) bt
> #0  0xb7dd8613 in strlen () from /lib/tls/i686/cmov/libc.so.6
> #1  0xb7da46d8 in vfprintf () from /lib/tls/i686/cmov/libc.so.6
> #2  0xb7e5e95a in __vasprintf_chk () from /lib/tls/i686/cmov/libc.so.6
> #3  0xb7ca66ff in IA__g_vasprintf (string=0x90b1e70, format=0xb77e638a "checksum=<%s>", args=0xbff5df68 "test����0^\b\t�<\006\t�����H���<\006\t ^\b\t")
>     at /usr/include/bits/stdio2.h:199
> #4  0xb7c933d2 in IA__g_string_append_vprintf (string=0x9063cb0, format=0xb77e638a "checksum=<%s>", 
>     args=0xbff5df68 "test����0^\b\t�<\006\t�����H���<\006\t ^\b\t") at gstring.c:1375
> #5  0xb7c9346f in IA__g_string_append_printf (string=0x9063cb0, format=0xb77e638a "checksum=<%s>") at gstring.c:1479
> #6  0xb77e4a74 in attachment_inspect (string=0x9063cb0, data=0x9085e20, user_data=0x0) at test-document.c:521
> #7  0xb7f348ab in gcut_list_inspect (list=0x9063cd0, inspect_func=0xb77e49b0 <attachment_inspect>, user_data=0x0) at gcut-list.c:57
> #8  0xb7f369e7 in gcut_assert_equal_list_helper (expected=0x9063cd0, actual=0x9089270, equal_function=0xb77e4a90 <attachment_equal>, 
>     inspect_function=0xb77e49b0 <attachment_inspect>, inspect_user_data=0x0, expression_expected=0xb77e6327 "expected", 
>     expression_actual=0xb77e6320 "actual", expression_equal_function=0xb77e630f "attachment_equal") at gcut-assertions-helper.c:98
> #9  0xb77e4990 in test_attachment () at test-document.c:558
> #10 0xb7f16039 in invoke (test=0x907b150, test_context=0x907f740, run_context=0x906d800) at cut-test.c:403
> #11 0xb7f1672b in run (test=0x907b150, test_context=0x907f740, run_context=0x906d800) at cut-test.c:429
> #12 0xb7f156af in cut_test_run (test=0x907b150, test_context=0x907f740, run_context=0x906d800) at cut-test.c:461
> #13 0xb7f193bb in cut_test_case_run_with_filter (test_case=0x9079d40, run_context=0x906d800, test_names=0x0) at cut-test-case.c:338
> #14 0xb7f19c5a in run (data=0x907d358, user_data=0xbff5e4b8) at cut-test-suite.c:244
> #15 0xb7f1a4af in cut_test_suite_run_test_cases (test_suite=0x9070018, run_context=0x906d800, test_cases=0x907fdb0, test_names=0x0) at cut-test-suite.c:290
> #16 0xb7f1a759 in cut_test_suite_run_with_filter (test_suite=0x9070018, run_context=0x906d800, test_case_names=0x0, test_names=0x0) at cut-test-suite.c:582
> #17 0xb7f1a7e6 in cut_test_suite_run (suite=0x9070018, run_context=0x906d800) at cut-test-suite.c:505
> #18 0xb7f12769 in cut_test_runner_run_test_suite (runner=0x906d800, test_suite=0x9070018) at cut-test-runner.c:767
> #19 0xb7f1495c in runner_run (runner=0x906d800) at cut-test-runner.c:722
> #20 0xb7f1253e in cut_runner_run (runner=0x906d800) at cut-runner.c:68
> #21 0xb7f0f0a4 in cut_run_context_start (context=0x906d800) at cut-run-context.c:1758
> #22 0xb7ee5f1d in run (ui=0x9064a00, run_context=0x906d800) at cut-console-ui.c:912
> #23 0xb7f22546 in cut_ui_run (ui=0x9064a00, run_context=0x906d800) at cut-ui.c:103
> #24 0xb7f14d8a in cut_start_run_context (run_context=0x906d800) at cut-main.c:411
> #25 0xb7f14f72 in cut_run () at cut-main.c:439
> #26 0x080485aa in main (argc=Cannot access memory at address 0x0
> ) at main.c:35
> (gdb)

Hmm, I don't know why expected attachments had been
destroyed when gcut_assert_equal_list() at test-document.c:558.

If you apply the patch, is the test passed?

diff --git a/glib/test/test-document.c b/glib/test/test-document.c
index 117b314..06a4cc6 100644
--- a/glib/test/test-document.c
+++ b/glib/test/test-document.c
@@ -553,7 +553,7 @@ test_attachment (void)
       actual = g_list_append (actual, g_object_ref (attachment));
     }
 
-  gcut_take_list (expected, g_object_unref);
+  /* gcut_take_list (expected, g_object_unref); */
   gcut_take_list (actual, g_object_unref);
   gcut_assert_equal_list (expected,
                           actual,

Thanks,
--
kou
