[poppler] About getFileSpecNameForPlatform
Carlos Garcia Campos
carlosgc at gnome.org
Wed Jul 8 02:30:15 PDT 2009
El mar, 30-06-2009 a las 18:23 -0700, Leonard Rosenthol escribió:
> I would actually recommend you inverse this, trying to use the UF
> first (since it's the newest and most generic), then falling back to F
> (also generic) and then finally looking for Dos/Unix/Mac. Also, since
> those last three are almost never generated, you'll find the value
> faster.
That wouldn't work for the document attached to bug 22551 which contains
the following action:
/Title ([Quellen])
/A <<
/S /Launch
/F <<
/F (../../../quellen/zip/95/5-313.zip)
/Unix (../../../quellen/tar/95/5-313.tgz)
>>
I think the idea here is to use the tgz when the document is running on
a Unix system and the zip file otherwise. The spec says F is required
only when Unix, Mac, etc. are all missing.
I'll push the patch as it is right now at the moment.
> Leonard
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: poppler-bounces at lists.freedesktop.org [mailto:poppler-bounces at lists.freedesktop.org] On Behalf Of Albert Astals Cid
> Sent: Tuesday, June 30, 2009 5:12 PM
> To: poppler at lists.freedesktop.org
> Subject: [poppler] About getFileSpecNameForPlatform
>
> Hi, file on bug 22551 is failing on getFileSpecNameForPlatform
>
> if (fileSpec->isDict()) {
> #ifdef WIN32
> if (!fileSpec->dictLookup("DOS", &obj1)->isString()) {
> #else
> if (!fileSpec->dictLookup("Unix", &obj1)->isString()) {
> #endif
> obj1.free();
> if (fileSpec->dictLookup("UF", &obj1)->isString ()) {
> name = obj1.getString()->copy();
> } else if (fileSpec->dictLookup("F", &obj1)->isString ()) {
> name = obj1.getString()->copy();
> } else {
> error(-1, "Illegal file spec in link");
> }
> }
> obj1.free();
>
> // error
> } else {
> error(-1, "Illegal file spec in link");
> }
>
> The thing is that i seem to miss a else here, i mean if Unix is not found we
> use UF or F, but if Unix is found shouldn't we do
> name = obj1.getString()->copy();
>
> Carlos i think this code is yours, is it a typo/bug or am i missing something?
>
> Albert
> _______________________________________________
> poppler mailing list
> poppler at lists.freedesktop.org
> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/poppler
> _______________________________________________
> poppler mailing list
> poppler at lists.freedesktop.org
> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/poppler
--
Carlos Garcia Campos
PGP key: http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x523E6462
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Esta parte del mensaje =?ISO-8859-1?Q?est=E1?= firmada
digitalmente
Url : http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/poppler/attachments/20090708/db697339/attachment.pgp
More information about the poppler
mailing list