[poppler] [PATCH 0/5] Various fixes relating to bug #24575

[Albert Astals Cid]

A Dimecres, 27 de gener de 2010, David A Benjamin va escriure:
> On Wed, 27 Jan 2010, Albert Astals Cid wrote:
> > A Divendres, 22 de gener de 2010, David A Benjamin va escriure:
> >> Oops. Sorry guys; forgot to set the subject.
> >
> > I've applied the changes and ran my test suite, found the following:
> >
> > It fixes http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=26248
> 
> Fancy.
> 
> > It changes the rendering of
> > http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6688 but can't tell if better
> > or worse, we render different than Adobe Reader
> >
> > It changes rendering of pages 4, 5, 8, 9, 10, 13, 17, 25, 29 of
> > http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10898 but can't tell if
> > better or worse, we render different than Adobe Reader	(starting index at
> > 1)
> 
> Mmm. I'll go look at those this evening and see what (else?) is wrong
> with them.
> 
> > It changes rendering of pages 3, 4, 5, 14, 14 of
> > http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=24575 i'd say it looks better
> > but still different than Adobe Reader	(starting index at 1)
> 
> Hrm. Where is it different? It was my main test case when working on
> these; I thought I got it to match. I see several missing columns, but
> they are similarly missing on acroread (Adobe Reader 9.2).

Right, my fault, it is like Adobe.

I've commited all the patches expect the first one that is about 
CairoOutputDev and i'll leave it to Carlos to decide.

Thanks for the work :-)

Albert

> 
> That PDF apparently has pretty ridiculous issues; if you run
> podofouncompress on it, you get zlib errors, but both acroread and poppler
> manage to make some sense of the stream and, at least as far as I can
> tell, look the same now, but apparently not? (Poppler strangely doesn't
> complain about zlib. I'm guessing it doesn't check for errors in some
> location and should.)
> 
> 
> David
>