[poppler] [PATCH] Annotation removal improvements
Carlos Garcia Campos
carlosgc at gnome.org
Thu May 24 02:50:37 PDT 2012
Excerpts from Albert Astals Cid's message of mié may 23 20:01:08 +0200 2012:
> El Dimarts, 22 de maig de 2012, a les 00:44:26, Fabio D'Urso va escriure:
> > On Sunday, May 20, 2012 07:04:45 PM Fabio D'Urso wrote:
> > > On Sunday, May 20, 2012 12:27:52 PM Carlos Garcia Campos wrote:
> > > > Why doesn't Page::removeAnnot() also remove the appearances? I've
> > > > noticed that the qt4 implementation removes the popup and appearances
> > > > manually. [...]
> > > > What happens with all other objects referenced by annotations? I guess
> > > > they are all left in the document, should we remove them too? like the
> > > > appearances? [...]
> > > > Maybe we could add a Annot::removeAnnotFromPage (or something like
> > > > that) so that every annotation can implement it to remove the objects
> > > > it references and not referenced by others.
> >
> > The attached patch defines a virtual Annot::removeReferencedObjects method
> > that each annotation type can reimplement. The base implementation takes
> > care of removing the appearance stream. The AnnotMarkup implementation
> > takes care of removing the popup too.
> >
> > > I have some doubts about setting /P if the annotation has no /P or a wrong
> > > value, because that would mean that annotations are automatically modified
> > > as soon as the document is loaded.
> >
> > This patch implements the following behavior:
> > - When parsing existing annotations, /P is ignored and the in-memory
> > page field is always set to the page which the annotation was read
> > from (without setting or changing the actual /P value).
> > - When adding a new annotation to a given page, /P is set accordingly.
>
> Carlos, does this work for you?
Yes.
> We'd be commiting this to master only right? No sense in commiting to 0.20
> branch.
Yes, master only, do you want me to push it?
> Albert
>
> >
> > Fabio
--
Carlos Garcia Campos
PGP key: http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x523E6462
More information about the poppler
mailing list