[poppler] XRef::fetch mutex lock

Thomas Freitag Thomas.Freitag at kabelmail.de
Thu Apr 4 23:47:22 PDT 2013 

Am 05.04.2013 00:38, schrieb Albert Astals Cid:
> El Dimecres, 3 d'abril de 2013, a les 19:32:23, Albert Astals Cid va escriure:
>> El Dimecres, 3 d'abril de 2013, a les 08:00:34, Thomas Freitag va escriure:
>>> Am 03.04.2013 00:01, schrieb Albert Astals Cid:
>>>> El Dimarts, 2 d'abril de 2013, a les 10:36:53, Thomas Freitag va
> escriure:
>>>>> Am 02.04.2013 09:22, schrieb Thomas Freitag:
>>>>>> Hi Albert!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Am 27.03.2013 12:29, schrieb Thomas Freitag:
>>>>>>> Sorry, pushed the wrong button, here my answer to the list:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Am 27.03.2013 11:41, schrieb Albert Astals Cid:
>>>>>>>> Why do we pass around the recursion integer around?
>>>>>>> No idea: The recursive integer wasn't introduced by the thread safe
>>>>>>> patch, it was already there. I just used it and extend some functions
>>>>>>> which incorrectly ignore that parameter instead of passing it to the
>>>>>>> called functions. Probably I missed some more than only the one in
>>>>>>> DCTStream::DCTStream.
>>>>>> I just ran a regression test over my PDF files, but I didn't get any
>>>>>> dead locks. So if You want me to solve that problem, You should
>>>>>> provide me that PDF. (Regardless if You prefer to use recursive mutex:
>>>>>> the endless loop detection need to pass the recursive integer
>>>>>> everywhere!)
>>>>> Attached a patch which corrects it. I made it in my sleep, 'cause the
>>>>> dead lock was probably caused by my patch for bug 61994 (even if that
>>>>> PDF doesn't cause any dead locks). This time I also respect the
>>>>> DCTStream usage if LIBJPEG is disabled :-)
>>>> Sure, this fixes the issue (and we should commit it to help with the
>>>> infinite recursion issue), but what's your opinion on making our mutexes
>>>> recursive?
>>> I think, a quite good discussion about recursive and non recursive mutes
>>> was here:
>>> http://stackoverflow.com/questions/187761/recursive-lock-mutex-vs-non-recu
>>> rs ive-lock-mutex. This convinced me to vote for a usage of recursive
>>> mutex in poppler: 1. xpdf and therfore poppler wasn't really designed for
>>> the usage of threads. We have it now working, but if we cherish on the
>>> usage of non recursive mutex we will always run into dead lock problems
>>> with futur patches again, so testing patches will become more expensive.
>>> 2. Since poppler nowhere uses emergency exits with "throw", we don't
>>> have the problem that we have to keep track that a thread releases a
>>> mutex so often it aquires it.
>>> 3. The only (small) problem I see is the sentence "Not all systems
>>> supporting pthreads also support recursive mutexes, but if they want to
>>> be POSIX conform, they have to
>>> <http://www.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/009695399/functions/pthread_mutexattr
>>> _g ettype.html>."
>> To be honest i don't think we should care much about the minority of systems
>> there that don't support recursive mutexes.
> Here's a quick patch I've hacked together (still needs some work in the
> buildsystem side).
>
> I'll finish it properly tomorrow but meanwhile can you guys check if it breaks
> something related to the multithreading side?
Just have a quick look at it, seems to be okay for me and should not 
break anything.
>
> I haven't touched the windows side since somewhere i've read that
> CriticalSections are already recursive. Can anyone confirm?
Yes, I confirm (That's also why I always have problems to detect dead 
locks during development time, 'cause I do that on WIndows)

Cheers,
Thomas
>
> Cheers,
>    Albert
>
>> Cheers,
>>    Albert
>>
>>> Cheers,
>>> Thomas
>>>
>>>> It should help us making the code simpler since we could just drop all
>>>> the
>>>> DoNotLockMutex cases, no?
>>>>
>>>> Cheers,
>>>>
>>>>     Albert
>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>> Thomas
>>>>>
>>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>>> Thomas
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Wouldn't a real recursive mutex be enough?
>>>>>>> No idea: I used in the thread safe patch just the pthread_lock which
>>>>>>> was defined. I'm not knowing what happens when we change it globally
>>>>>>> i.e. if it affects other usages of the GooMutex. Just feel free to
>>>>>>> change it, You should have the better overview of usages than I have.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>>>> Thomas
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I'm asking because i have a document here (that sadly i can't share)
>>>>>>>> that is deadlocking
>>>>>>>> itself there because we are not passing the recursion integer
>>>>>>>> everywhere (we lose it in DCTStream::DCTStream)
>>>>>>>> as shown in this backtrace
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> #0  __lll_lock_wait () at
>>>>>>>> ../nptl/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/x86_64/lowlevellock.S:135
>>>>>>>> #1  0x00007ffff599217c in _L_lock_982 () from
>>>>>>>> /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libpthread.so.0
>>>>>>>> #2  0x00007ffff5991fcb in __GI___pthread_mutex_lock (mutex=0x71dc10)
>>>>>>>> at pthread_mutex_lock.c:64
>>>>>>>> #3  0x00007ffff5f02f73 in MutexLocker::MutexLocker
>>>>>>>> (this=0x7fffffffcfb0, mutexA=0x71dc10, modeA=DoLockMutex) at
>>>>>>>> /home/tsdgeos/devel/poppler/goo/GooMutex.h:72
>>>>>>>> #4  0x00007ffff5fac8e2 in XRef::fetch (this=0x71db50, num=5, gen=0,
>>>>>>>> obj=0x7fffffffd0b0, recursion=0) at
>>>>>>>> /home/tsdgeos/devel/poppler/poppler/XRef.cc:1137
>>>>>>>> #5  0x00007ffff5f8a013 in Object::fetch (this=0x71fe08,
>>>>>>>> xref=0x71db50, obj=0x7fffffffd0b0, recursion=0) at
>>>>>>>> /home/tsdgeos/devel/poppler/poppler/Object.cc:122
>>>>>>>> #6  0x00007ffff5f19de4 in Dict::lookup (this=0x71fb60,
>>>>>>>> key=0x7ffff606fbba "Height", obj=0x7fffffffd0b0, recursion=0) at
>>>>>>>> /home/tsdgeos/devel/poppler/poppler/Dict.cc:256
>>>>>>>> #7  0x00007ffff5f032e9 in Object::dictLookup (this=0x7fffffffd5a0,
>>>>>>>> key=0x7ffff606fbba "Height", obj=0x7fffffffd0b0, recursion=0) at
>>>>>>>> /home/tsdgeos/devel/poppler/poppler/Object.h:315
>>>>>>>> #8  0x00007ffff601f8a3 in DCTStream::DCTStream (this=0x7832b0,
>>>>>>>> strA=0x720780, colorXformA=-1, dict=0x7fffffffd5a0) at
>>>>>>>> /home/tsdgeos/devel/poppler/poppler/DCTStream.cc:72
>>>>>>>> #9  0x00007ffff5f9bf6d in Stream::makeFilter (this=0x720780,
>>>>>>>> name=0x71fef0 "DCTDecode", str=0x720780, params=0x7fffffffd1e0,
>>>>>>>> recursion=1, dict=0x7fffffffd5a0) at
>>>>>>>> /home/tsdgeos/devel/poppler/poppler/Stream.cc:311
>>>>>>>> #10 0x00007ffff5f9b71a in Stream::addFilters (this=0x720780,
>>>>>>>> dict=0x7fffffffd5a0, recursion=1) at
>>>>>>>> /home/tsdgeos/devel/poppler/poppler/Stream.cc:184
>>>>>>>> #11 0x00007ffff5f9204b in Parser::makeStream (this=0x71fcd0,
>>>>>>>> dict=0x7fffffffd5a0, fileKey=0x0, encAlgorithm=cryptRC4,
>>>>>>>> keyLength=1146103040, objNum=3, objGen=0, recursion=1, strict=false)
>>>>>>>> at /home/tsdgeos/devel/poppler/poppler/Parser.cc:280
>>>>>>>> #12 0x00007ffff5f918e6 in Parser::getObj (this=0x71fcd0,
>>>>>>>> obj=0x7fffffffd5a0, simpleOnly=false, fileKey=0x0,
>>>>>>>> encAlgorithm=cryptRC4, keyLength=1146103040, objNum=3, objGen=0,
>>>>>>>> recursion=0, strict=false) at
>>>>>>>> /home/tsdgeos/devel/poppler/poppler/Parser.cc:131
>>>>>>>> #13 0x00007ffff5facdd3 in XRef::fetch (this=0x71db50, num=3, gen=0,
>>>>>>>> obj=0x7fffffffd5a0, recursion=0) at
>>>>>>>> /home/tsdgeos/devel/poppler/poppler/XRef.cc:1197
>>>>>>>> #14 0x00007ffff5f8a013 in Object::fetch (this=0x71e128,
>>>>>>>> xref=0x71db50, obj=0x7fffffffd5a0, recursion=0) at
>>>>>>>> /home/tsdgeos/devel/poppler/poppler/Object.cc:122
>>>>>>>> #15 0x00007ffff5f19de4 in Dict::lookup (this=0x71e660, key=0x7206e0
>>>>>>>> "Im1", obj=0x7fffffffd5a0, recursion=0) at
>>>>>>>> /home/tsdgeos/devel/poppler/poppler/Dict.cc:256
>>>>>>>> #16 0x00007ffff5f032e9 in Object::dictLookup (this=0x71e598,
>>>>>>>> key=0x7206e0 "Im1", obj=0x7fffffffd5a0, recursion=0) at
>>>>>>>> /home/tsdgeos/devel/poppler/poppler/Object.h:315
>>>>>>>> #17 0x00007ffff5f2a647 in GfxResources::lookupXObject
>>>>>>>> (this=0x71e590, name=0x7206e0 "Im1", obj=0x7fffffffd5a0) at
>>>>>>>> /home/tsdgeos/devel/poppler/poppler/Gfx.cc:411
>>>>>>>> #18 0x00007ffff5f3f41e in Gfx::opXObject (this=0x71e440,
>>>>>>>> args=0x7fffffffd720, numArgs=1) at
>>>>>>>> /home/tsdgeos/devel/poppler/poppler/Gfx.cc:4114
>>>>>>>> #19 0x00007ffff5f2bfd6 in Gfx::execOp (this=0x71e440,
>>>>>>>> cmd=0x7fffffffd6e0, args=0x7fffffffd720, numArgs=1) at
>>>>>>>> /home/tsdgeos/devel/poppler/poppler/Gfx.cc:858
>>>>>>>> #20 0x00007ffff5f2b82b in Gfx::go (this=0x71e440, topLevel=true) at
>>>>>>>> /home/tsdgeos/devel/poppler/poppler/Gfx.cc:717
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>      Albert
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>> poppler mailing list
>>>>>>>> poppler at lists.freedesktop.org
>>>>>>>> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/poppler
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> .
>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>> poppler mailing list
>>>>>>> poppler at lists.freedesktop.org
>>>>>>> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/poppler
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> .
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> poppler mailing list
>>>>>> poppler at lists.freedesktop.org
>>>>>> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/poppler
>>>>>>
>>>>>> .
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> poppler mailing list
>>>> poppler at lists.freedesktop.org
>>>> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/poppler
>>>>
>>>> .
>> _______________________________________________
>> poppler mailing list
>> poppler at lists.freedesktop.org
>> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/poppler
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> poppler mailing list
>> poppler at lists.freedesktop.org
>> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/poppler

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/poppler/attachments/20130405/84360746/attachment.html>

More information about the poppler mailing list