[poppler] Bug 69485

[Alex Korobkin]

2014/1/3 Adrian Johnson <ajohnson at redneon.com>

> On 03/01/14 15:15, Ross Moore wrote:
> > Hi Adrian,
> >
> > On 03/01/2014, at 10:01 AM, Adrian Johnson wrote:
> >
> >> Leonard,
> >> Do you have any idea why Adobe Distiller fails on the PS output? The PS
> >> files print fine on my Xerox printer which has Adobe PS.
> >
> > The error occurs in the PostScript around lines  44378-44379.
> > Comment out these 2 lines and the file will distill just fine.
> >
> > The lines commented-out should look like:
> >
> >>> % imagemask
> >>> % Gar8O!!3<."p5&6Mu*H<lMpm`s8T;%s*la!#Nl!cb6!e-!5&ILgA~>
> >
> > Of course this omits something on page 4.
> > It is the red arrow indicating where a signature is required.
> >
> > This seems to have been added over the top of the underlying form,
> > using coding that looks a bit suspect to me.
> > viz.
> >
> >>> 8 dict dup begin
> >>>   /ImageType 1 def
> >>>   /Width 24 def
> >>>   /Height 15 def
> >>>   /Interpolate false def
> >>>   /BitsPerComponent 1 def
> >>>   /Decode [ 1 0 ] def
> >>>   /DataSource currentfile /ASCII85Decode filter /FlateDecode filter def
> >>>   /Interpolate false def
> >>>   /ImageMatrix [ 1 0 0 -1 0 15 ] def
> >>> end
> >>> imagemask
> >>> Gar8O!!3<."p5&6Mu*H<lMpm`s8T;%s*la!#Nl!cb6!e-!5&ILgA~>
> >
> > Firstly there are 9 entries being defined within the dictionary,
> >  but then /Interpolate is given twice.
> >
> > The /DataSource  line looks quite wrong.
> >   "DataSource must be a single file, procedure, or string"
> >    --- PS Ref. Manual v3
> > so maybe this will do:
> >    /DataSource {currentfile /ASCII85Decode filter /FlateDecode filter}
> def
> > but when testing the same /undefined  error occurs with  imagemask ,
> > which could indicate something wrong in the preceding dictionary.
>
>
Ross,
thanks a lot for the detailed analysis.


>  I tried turning it into a procedure and it fails with ghostscript and my
> printer. It turns out it was correct. See example 4.26 on p311 of the PS
> Ref.
>
> Adrian,
I'm not sure I fully understand your answer. Do you think this PostScript
code is actually correct?

2014/1/3 Leonard Rosenthol <lrosenth at adobe.com>

> >Ricoh says that if it cannot be read by Distiller, it won't be processed
> >by printers.
> >
> Ricoh is just looking to place blame - this is simply false.  Even more so
> because all of our printer OEM's do a LOT of customization of the
> technology that they receive in order to differentiate their products from
> each other.


Leonard,
Thanks, I'm not looking to blame anyone, I'm just trying to file a bug
report to a correct place. I'm still unsure if this is something wrong in
the original PDF, or is it to be reported to poppler or cairo teams, or
maybe Distiller is unable to process a piece of valid PostScript code.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/poppler/attachments/20140103/0ee8f8df/attachment.html>