[poppler] pdftotext (0.24.5 version) - Memory Leak
Marco
ctxspi at gmail.com
Wed Mar 19 05:20:06 PDT 2014
Hello
I have check any memory leak with valgrind and original pdftotext
(poppler-0.24.5) because using it's code in my program that converts a
sequence of pdf files in text format, I've seen that takes too much system
memory.
For test I have used a pdf file (it had inside only ONE WORD) with command
'valgrind -v --tool=memcheck --leak-check=full --show-reachable=yes
--track-origins=yes ./pdftotext -bbox /tmp/file.pdf - 2>/tmp/valgrind.log
>> /tmp/valgrind.log' and in return briefly this result:
==11606== LEAK SUMMARY:
==11606== definitely lost: 24 bytes in 1 blocks
==11606== indirectly lost: 0 bytes in 0 blocks
==11606== possibly lost: 0 bytes in 0 blocks
==11606== still reachable: 22,311 bytes in 740 blocks
==11606== suppressed: 0 bytes in 0 blocks
==11606==
==11606== ERROR SUMMARY: 1 errors from 1 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
--
==11607== LEAK SUMMARY:
==11607== definitely lost: 34 bytes in 1 blocks
==11607== indirectly lost: 0 bytes in 0 blocks
==11607== possibly lost: 0 bytes in 0 blocks
==11607== still reachable: 21,247 bytes in 694 blocks
==11607== suppressed: 0 bytes in 0 blocks
==11607==
==11607== ERROR SUMMARY: 1 errors from 1 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
--
==11609== LEAK SUMMARY:
==11609== definitely lost: 14 bytes in 1 blocks
==11609== indirectly lost: 0 bytes in 0 blocks
==11609== possibly lost: 0 bytes in 0 blocks
==11609== still reachable: 46,029 bytes in 2,147 blocks
==11609== suppressed: 0 bytes in 0 blocks
==11609==
==11609== ERROR SUMMARY: 1 errors from 1 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
--
I'm not expert programmer but in this case log of valgrind like this:
==11606== 1,600 bytes in 1 blocks are still reachable in loss record 523 of
524
==11606== at 0x4007D89: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:236)
==11606== by 0x80AE501: xmalloc (in /bin/bash)
==11606== by 0x524F4C4E: ???
==11606==
==11606== 3,163 bytes in 51 blocks are still reachable in loss record 524
of 524
==11606== at 0x4007D89: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:236)
==11606== by 0x80AE501: xmalloc (in /bin/bash)
==11606== by 0x807925A: ??? (in /bin/bash)
==11606== by 0x807C12C: maybe_make_export_env (in /bin/bash)
==11606== by 0x808D2C4: command_substitute (in /bin/bash)
==11606== by 0x80931B9: ??? (in /bin/bash)
==11606== by 0x809431C: ??? (in /bin/bash)
==11606== by 0x80946C8: expand_word_unsplit (in /bin/bash)
==11606== by 0x8077B6C: ??? (in /bin/bash)
==11606== by 0x80741D4: execute_command_internal (in /bin/bash)
==11606== by 0x8077A21: execute_command (in /bin/bash)
==11606== by 0x8077FA4: ??? (in /bin/bash)
are incomprehensible for me and despite all my goodwill I'm not able to
understand where to find code that cause memory leak.
Unfortunately, the excessive use of memory does not allow to utilize code
for the intensive uses.
greetings
Marco
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/poppler/attachments/20140319/749e6c1f/attachment.html>
More information about the poppler
mailing list