[poppler] Moving up our "minimum" Linux base

William Bader williambader at hotmail.com
Tue Feb 5 01:51:00 UTC 2019


Thanks! I didn't know about gcc 4.8 std::regex issue or about the devtoolset packaging. I built gcc 8.2 from source on my CentOS 4, 5, 6, and 7 build systems last July, but I have only been using it for the C compiler.
William

________________________________
From: poppler <poppler-bounces at lists.freedesktop.org> on behalf of Albert Astals Cid <aacid at kde.org>
Sent: Monday, February 4, 2019 1:22 PM
To: poppler at lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [poppler] Moving up our "minimum" Linux base

El dilluns, 4 de febrer de 2019, a les 8:28:54 CET, Thomas Freitag va escriure:
> Hi William!
>
> But gcc 4.8.5 could cause problems since poppler uses std::regex, see
> i.e. here
> https://stackoverflow.com/questions/12530406/is-gcc-4-8-or-earlier-buggy-about-regular-expressions.
> Since I encounterd problems with poppler similar to
> https://github.com/isc-projects/ethq/issues/5 I switched to devtoolset-3
> on CentOS which use 4.9.2 and  seems to solve that problem with regex.

exactly on centos you can get up to gcc 8.2 http://mirror.centos.org/centos/7/sclo/x86_64/rh/devtoolset-8/

Cheers,
  Albert

>
> Cheers,
> Thomas
> Am 03.02.19 um 17:48 schrieb William Bader:
> > CentOS 7 has gcc 4.8.5, and I think that RHEL 8 is still in beta.
> >
> >
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > *From:* poppler <poppler-bounces at lists.freedesktop.org> on behalf of
> > Adam Reichold <adam.reichold at t-online.de>
> > *Sent:* Sunday, February 3, 2019 10:44 AM
> > *To:* poppler at lists.freedesktop.org
> > *Subject:* Re: [poppler] Moving up our "minimum" Linux base
> > Hello Albert,
> >
> > Am 03.02.19 um 14:39 schrieb Albert Astals Cid:
> > > Right now our minimum Linux base as "guaranteed" by the gitlab CI is
> > > Ubuntu 14.04. Since that is going out of support even by Canonical
> > > this April I'd like to move that "minimum" to Ubuntu 16.04.
> > >
> > > Particularly that means we could start requiring features available
> > in gcc 5.4
> > >
> > > Anyone against this?
> >
> > Didn't you mention some company-internal regression test runners that
> > would still tie us to GCC 4.9?
> >
> > > Cheers,
> > >   Albert
> >
> > Best regards,
> > Adam
> > _______________________________________________
> > poppler mailing list
> > poppler at lists.freedesktop.org
> > https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/poppler
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > poppler mailing list
> > poppler at lists.freedesktop.org
> > https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/poppler
>
>
>




_______________________________________________
poppler mailing list
poppler at lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/poppler
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/poppler/attachments/20190205/60a8ab48/attachment.html>


More information about the poppler mailing list