[Portland] xdg-utils: common return values [CORRECT PATCH]

[Kevin Krammer]

On Sunday 30 April 2006 03:31, Bastian, Waldo wrote:
> It's easier that way to point someone to webcvs and have them try out
> one of the scripts. It also makes it easy to link to the html manpages
> in webcvs.
>
> This whole include business looks a bit like overengineering to me btw,
> let's keep things simple.

Hmm. How about build time including the xdg-include file in the scripts, but 
still have it separated from xdg-utils-common-in?

This way we have
- each script working stand alone
- a file to include for scripts using xdg-utils (xdg-include or 
xdg-utils-include), quite like a public header file
- a file to separate common scripts parts into for easier development 
(xdg-utils-common.in) quite like a private header file

Cheers,
Kevin

-- 
Kevin Krammer <kevin.krammer at gmx.at>
Qt/KDE Developer, Debian User
Moderator: www.mrunix.de (German), www.qtcentre.org
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/portland/attachments/20060430/82b3571c/attachment.pgp