[Portland] Doubts about xdg-su and xdg-screensaver (Was Re: First
xdg-utils beta release)
dank at kegel.com
Thu Jul 6 15:38:06 PDT 2006
On 7/6/06, David Zeuthen <david at fubar.dk> wrote:
> xdg-su really needs to go. Here are just two reasons
> 1. I don't think we should be encouraging ISV's to use insecure
> methods to do privileged operations. It's a get-out-of-jail-card
> that encourages lazy programming.
> 2. I'm not sure how this would be implemented on Fedora or RHEL and,
> unless I'm mistaken, the point is to not lock out any OS'es that
> wants to participate, yes?
Once polkit-su is ready, can't xdg-su be a symlink to it?
So what's the problem?
More information about the Portland