[Portland] xdg-utils test suite

[Bastian, Waldo]

People that want to check it out can use the tarball at
http://portland.freedesktop.org/download/xdg-utils-20060721.tgz
which contains a snapshop of xdg-utils and the test suite.

Waldo Bastian
Linux Client Architect - Client Linux Foundation Technology
Channel Platform Solutions Group
Intel Corporation - http://www.intel.com/go/linux
OSDL DTL Tech Board Chairman

>-----Original Message-----
>From: portland-bounces at lists.freedesktop.org [mailto:portland-
>bounces at lists.freedesktop.org] On Behalf Of Whipple, Tom
>Sent: Tuesday, July 18, 2006 5:34 PM
>To: portland at lists.freedesktop.org
>Subject: [Portland] xdg-utils test suite
>
>All,
>
>I have checked in a test suite for xdg-utils in
><Portland>/xdg-utils/tests.
>
>To run: cd <Portland>/xdg-utls/tests
>$ ./testrun
>
>A few notes:
>
>1. It is not yet totally complete, but I believe that I have good
>coverage of the "install time" utilities. Feel free to suggest
additions
>or deletions to what is tested.
>
>2. It the default run features interactive tests. They are designed to
>be useful in cases where someone must visually verify the presence of a
>GUI component. (But, they can be disabled with testrun -I)
>
>3. Many of the tests fail in my development environment (SUSE
>10.0/Gnome), but mostly this is due to unexpected output on
>STDOUT/STDERR.
>
>4. Tests that have the status NORESULT mean that some prerequisite
>failed, while tests with status UNTESTED mean that root access was
>required and the test is not being run as root (or vice versa.)
>
>I will be continuing to check in tests in the coming days in
preparation
>for release BETA2 of Portland.
>
>As always, any comments or criticisms are welcome.
>
>-tom
>
>
>
>___________
>Tom Whipple
>Client Linux Foundation Technology Group
>Intel Corporation - http://www.intel.com/go/linux
>_______________________________________________
>Portland mailing list
>Portland at lists.freedesktop.org
>http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/portland