[Portland] Transport mechanism

[Dan Kegel]

On 3/2/06, Alex Graveley <alex at beatniksoftware.com> wrote:
> Lubos Lunak wrote:
> > If nothing else, DBUS is still AFAIK considered unstable.
>
> I haven't been following this very closely, but really please consider
> using D-BUS.

Indeed.
Lubos, can you point to the instability of D-BUS you were
referring to?

Before we go off way off defining our own protocol, let's try
just using D-BUS.  It has its own marshalling and everything,
even if it is (yuck!) xml inside.
- Dan


--
Wine for Windows ISVs: http://kegel.com/wine/isv