[Portland] Current plan summarized

[nf2]

I'm still not convinced regarding the static linking of the interface 
library. We have not discussed this thoroughly and perhaps it's too 
early to decide. I think there are two options here:

1) Standardize protocol, socket locations, dapi-daemon startup-scripts...
2) Standardize the API of a dynamically linked dapi-client library (You 
can still have convenience wrappers for C++,...), hiding all the IPC 
complexity.

At the moment i would prefer the second option.

Reagards,
Norbert



Bastian, Waldo wrote:
>
> I have summarized the current thinking around Portland on 
> http://www.freedesktop.org/wiki/Portland
>
>  
>
> Please speak up if you disagree with any of the statements, would like 
> to see them clearified or if you would like to see specific additional 
> issues addressed on that page.
>
>  
>
> Once there is concencus around this page I will add another page with 
> specific design considerations that need to be decided on.
>
>  
>
> Waldo Bastian
>
> Linux Client Architect - Channel Platform Solutions Group
>
> Intel Corporation - http://www.intel.com/go/linux
>
> OSDL DTL Tech Board Chairman
>
>  
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> Portland mailing list
> Portland at lists.freedesktop.org
> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/portland
>