[Portland] Current plan summarized

[Lubos Lunak]

On Wednesday 15 March 2006 18:03, Bastian, Waldo wrote:
> >On Tuesday 14 March 2006 22:43, Dan Kegel wrote:
> >> Do you want to require ISVs to ship a fallback daemon?
> >
> > If it shows to be the best way, yes. It's not like it'd be rocket science.
>
> I wasn't thinking about in terms of "rocket science" more in terms of
> "can of worms". Either you make a fallback deamon that doesn't depend on
> desktop specific libraries, in which case you can just as well include
> it in the Interface Library itself. Or you make a fallback daemon that
> _does_ depend on desktop specific libraries and then you end up in
> distro version hell.

 Hmm ... bummer ... I think you have a point there. And dropping this idea 
will actually solve for me some problems. Ok, everybody just ignore the 
nonsense about fallback daemon, I'll instead provide library hooks or 
something.

-- 
Lubos Lunak
KDE developer
---------------------------------------------------------------------
SuSE CR, s.r.o.  e-mail: l.lunak at suse.cz , l.lunak at kde.org
Drahobejlova 27  tel: +420 2 9654 2373
190 00 Praha 9   fax: +420 2 9654 2374
Czech Republic   http://www.suse.cz/