[pulseaudio-tickets] [Bug 87713] "Transistor" game makes every client playing at double speed
bugzilla-daemon at freedesktop.org
bugzilla-daemon at freedesktop.org
Mon Dec 29 19:03:08 PST 2014
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=87713
--- Comment #5 from Raymond <superquad.vortex2 at gmail.com> ---
static snd_pcm_uframes_t
snd_ca0106_pcm_pointer_playback(struct snd_pcm_substream *substream)
{
struct snd_ca0106 *emu = snd_pcm_substream_chip(substream);
struct snd_pcm_runtime *runtime = substream->runtime;
struct snd_ca0106_pcm *epcm = runtime->private_data;
unsigned int ptr, prev_ptr;
int channel = epcm->channel_id;
int timeout = 10;
if (!epcm->running)
return 0;
prev_ptr = -1;
do {
ptr = snd_ca0106_ptr_read(emu, PLAYBACK_LIST_PTR, channel);
ptr = (ptr >> 3) * runtime->period_size;
ptr += bytes_to_frames(runtime,
snd_ca0106_ptr_read(emu, PLAYBACK_POINTER, channel));
if (ptr >= runtime->buffer_size)
ptr -= runtime->buffer_size;
if (prev_ptr == ptr)
return ptr;
prev_ptr = ptr;
} while (--timeout);
dev_warn(emu->card->dev, "ca0106: unstable DMA pointer!\n");
return 0;
}
pointer callback return value from hardware register,
do the sound card report realtime accurate update poistion ?
http://cgit.freedesktop.org/pulseaudio/pulseaudio/plain/src/tests/alsa-time-test.c
try different fill rate
do the sound card report hw_ptr better than period size ?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/pulseaudio-bugs/attachments/20141230/3252fe63/attachment-0001.html>
More information about the pulseaudio-bugs
mailing list