[pulseaudio-tickets] [Bug 49608] periodic audio skips with Intel HDA

bugzilla-daemon at freedesktop.org bugzilla-daemon at freedesktop.org
Thu Apr 16 09:25:49 PDT 2015


https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=49608

--- Comment #52 from rkfg <rkfg at rkfg.me> ---
0.5 ms is just what PA reports as the minimal latency. I don't need it to be
this small, I just don't want it to grow up to 100 ms without the possibility
to automatically drop it back to normal. I suppose it's not possible to make PA
work with fragments as ALSA does. As I understand from the Lennart's article,
the latency in ALSA is the size of period ±something. For PA it's the size of
fragment * number of fragments as it reports this as the minimal latency in
pacmd list-sinks. It's also very noticeable when you use realtime apps like
LMMS or games.

However, it's not true for dmix. I play a file with everything at default on my
home PC with SB Live 7.1 (at work the overall picture is more or less the
same), here's what I have:

> aplay -v /usr/share/sounds/alsa/Front_Center.wav
Playing WAVE '/usr/share/sounds/alsa/Front_Center.wav' : Signed 16 bit Little
Endian, Rate 48000 Hz, Mono
Plug PCM: Route conversion PCM (sformat=S32_LE)
  Transformation table:
    0 <- 0
    1 <- 0
Its setup is:
  stream       : PLAYBACK
  access       : RW_INTERLEAVED
  format       : S16_LE
  subformat    : STD
  channels     : 1
  rate         : 48000
  exact rate   : 48000 (48000/1)
  msbits       : 16
  buffer_size  : 8192
  period_size  : 1024
  period_time  : 21333
  tstamp_mode  : NONE
  period_step  : 1
  avail_min    : 1024
  period_event : 0
  start_threshold  : 8192
  stop_threshold   : 8192
  silence_threshold: 0
  silence_size : 0
  boundary     : 4611686018427387904
Slave: Direct Stream Mixing PCM
Its setup is:
  stream       : PLAYBACK
  access       : MMAP_INTERLEAVED
  format       : S32_LE
  subformat    : STD
  channels     : 2
  rate         : 48000
  exact rate   : 48000 (48000/1)
  msbits       : 32
  buffer_size  : 8192
  period_size  : 1024
  period_time  : 21333
  tstamp_mode  : NONE
  period_step  : 1
  avail_min    : 1024
  period_event : 0
  start_threshold  : 8192
  stop_threshold   : 8192
  silence_threshold: 0
  silence_size : 0
  boundary     : 4611686018427387904
Hardware PCM card 0 'CA0106' device 0 subdevice 0
Its setup is:
  stream       : PLAYBACK
  access       : MMAP_INTERLEAVED
  format       : S32_LE
  subformat    : STD
  channels     : 2
  rate         : 48000
  exact rate   : 48000 (48000/1)
  msbits       : 32
  buffer_size  : 8192
  period_size  : 1024
  period_time  : 21333
  tstamp_mode  : ENABLE
  period_step  : 1
  avail_min    : 1024
  period_event : 0
  start_threshold  : 1
  stop_threshold   : 4611686018427387904
  silence_threshold: 0
  silence_size : 4611686018427387904
  boundary     : 4611686018427387904
  appl_ptr     : 0
  hw_ptr       : 0

The buffer size is 8192 frames which is8192 / 48000 == 0.17066 s == 170 ms but
there's no noticeable latency at all. If I setup PA not to use tsched and set 8
fragments of 21 ms each (almost exactly as in dmix), I have this setup then:

Apr 16 19:16:17 homecomp pulseaudio[6121]: [pulseaudio] alsa-util.c: Hardware
PCM card 0 'CA0106' device 0 subdevice 0
Apr 16 19:16:17 homecomp pulseaudio[6121]: [pulseaudio] alsa-util.c: Its setup
is:
Apr 16 19:16:17 homecomp pulseaudio[6121]: [pulseaudio] alsa-util.c:   stream  
    : PLAYBACK
Apr 16 19:16:17 homecomp pulseaudio[6121]: [pulseaudio] alsa-util.c:   access  
    : MMAP_INTERLEAVED
Apr 16 19:16:17 homecomp pulseaudio[6121]: [pulseaudio] alsa-util.c:   format  
    : S32_LE
Apr 16 19:16:17 homecomp pulseaudio[6121]: [pulseaudio] alsa-util.c:  
subformat    : STD
Apr 16 19:16:17 homecomp pulseaudio[6121]: [pulseaudio] alsa-util.c:   channels
    : 2
Apr 16 19:16:17 homecomp pulseaudio[6121]: [pulseaudio] alsa-util.c:   rate    
    : 48000
Apr 16 19:16:17 homecomp pulseaudio[6121]: [pulseaudio] alsa-util.c:   exact
rate   : 48000 (48000/1)
Apr 16 19:16:17 homecomp pulseaudio[6121]: [pulseaudio] alsa-util.c:   msbits  
    : 32
Apr 16 19:16:17 homecomp pulseaudio[6121]: [pulseaudio] alsa-util.c:  
buffer_size  : 8064
Apr 16 19:16:17 homecomp pulseaudio[6121]: [pulseaudio] alsa-util.c:  
period_size  : 1008
Apr 16 19:16:17 homecomp pulseaudio[6121]: [pulseaudio] alsa-util.c:  
period_time  : 21000
Apr 16 19:16:17 homecomp pulseaudio[6121]: [pulseaudio] alsa-util.c:  
tstamp_mode  : ENABLE
Apr 16 19:16:17 homecomp pulseaudio[6121]: [pulseaudio] alsa-util.c:  
period_step  : 1
Apr 16 19:16:17 homecomp pulseaudio[6121]: [pulseaudio] alsa-util.c:  
avail_min    : 1008
Apr 16 19:16:17 homecomp pulseaudio[6121]: [pulseaudio] alsa-util.c:  
period_event : 1
Apr 16 19:16:17 homecomp pulseaudio[6121]: [pulseaudio] alsa-util.c:  
start_threshold  : -1
Apr 16 19:16:17 homecomp pulseaudio[6121]: [pulseaudio] alsa-util.c:  
stop_threshold   : 9079256848778919936
Apr 16 19:16:17 homecomp pulseaudio[6121]: [pulseaudio] alsa-util.c:  
silence_threshold: 0
Apr 16 19:16:17 homecomp pulseaudio[6121]: [pulseaudio] alsa-util.c:  
silence_size : 0
Apr 16 19:16:17 homecomp pulseaudio[6121]: [pulseaudio] alsa-util.c:   boundary
    : 9079256848778919936
Apr 16 19:16:17 homecomp pulseaudio[6121]: [pulseaudio] alsa-util.c:   appl_ptr
    : 0
Apr 16 19:16:17 homecomp pulseaudio[6121]: [pulseaudio] alsa-util.c:   hw_ptr  
    : 0

The point is, while the configuration looks the same the latency is huge, it's
exactly 168 ms and is just unbearable. That's what happens after some really
bad PC slowdowns because of the workload and it happens for every app and
there's no way to make it behave properly without restarting PA and everything
else. So why PA doesn't work as dmix does? Why dmix has 168ms buffer and
responds instantly like there's no perceptible latency? Why dmix never
underruns (at least audibly) while PA does it pretty often on a range of
chipsets? I would be pretty happy with 21 ms fixed latency that never underruns
but I just can't setup PA to work like this.

Please, Raymond, don't go into the details, like, this particular card isn't
Intel HDA the period size in PA is slightly less (1008 vs 1024) and so on. I
see it clearly, that's not important here. What's important is the fact that
dmix does its job much better than PA in any configuration (negligible latency
+ no underruns) and I want to know why and how to make PA work like dmix in
this regard.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/pulseaudio-bugs/attachments/20150416/d7c9e7a3/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the pulseaudio-bugs mailing list