<html> <head> <base href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/"> </head> <body> <div> <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_RESOLVED bz_closed" title="RESOLVED FIXED - memfd doesn't work between 64-bit server and 32-bit client" href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=97769#c9">Comment # 9</a> on <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_RESOLVED bz_closed" title="RESOLVED FIXED - memfd doesn't work between 64-bit server and 32-bit client" href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=97769">bug 97769</a> from <a class="email" href="mailto:darwish.07@gmail.com" title="Ahmed S. Darwish <darwish.07@gmail.com>"> Ahmed S. Darwish</a> <pre>On Thu, Nov 17, 2016 at 05:48:25PM +0000, <a href="mailto:bugzilla-daemon@freedesktop.org">bugzilla-daemon@freedesktop.org</a> wrote: > > --- <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=97769#c8">Comment #8</a> from Tanu Kaskinen <<a href="mailto:tanuk@iki.fi">tanuk@iki.fi</a>> --- > (In reply to Ahmed S. Darwish from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=97769#c6">comment #6</a>) > > Instead of releasing a 9.1 though (which might or might not be bundled after > > all), I'm thinking of adding special code to 10.0 server side: refuse > > declaring server's memfd support if the client version is < 10.0. > > > > Tanu, what do you think about this? > > Adding a version check would probably be trivial. Would you be willing to make > a patch? > Yeah, expect the patch by tomorrow. It would be important to include that before a 10.0 release.</pre> </div> <hr> You are receiving this mail because: <ul> <li>You are the QA Contact for the bug.</li> </ul> </body> </html>