<html> <head> <base href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/"> </head> <body> <div> <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW - Lack of hardware volume no longer supported with HifimeDIY Tiny" href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=99607#c5">Comment # 5</a> on <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW - Lack of hardware volume no longer supported with HifimeDIY Tiny" href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=99607">bug 99607</a> from <a class="email" href="mailto:tanuk@iki.fi" title="Tanu Kaskinen <tanuk@iki.fi>"> Tanu Kaskinen</a> <pre>(In reply to Jerome from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=99607#c4">comment #4</a>) > if it's possible to get the card properly set-up, > wouldn't this be an auto-detection issue rather than a driver one? Unless > the driver somehow drives/influence in a bad way the auto-detection process? The driver claims that the sound card provides hardware volume control, but actually it doesn't. Should PulseAudio ignore all hardware volume controls, because on some cards they do nothing? Surely not. There's no way PulseAudio can automatically figure out whether a hardware volume control does something or not, other than by having a list of hardware with broken drivers. Rather than working around broken drivers in PulseAudio, the drivers should be fixed.</pre> </div> <hr> You are receiving this mail because: <ul> <li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li> <li>You are the QA Contact for the bug.</li> </ul> </body> </html>