<html>
<head>
<base href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/">
</head>
<body>
<p>
<div>
<b><a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_NEW "
title="NEW - i18n: update French translation"
href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=100962#c11">Comment # 11</a>
on <a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_NEW "
title="NEW - i18n: update French translation"
href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=100962">bug 100962</a>
from <span class="vcard"><a class="email" href="mailto:tanuk@iki.fi" title="Tanu Kaskinen <tanuk@iki.fi>"> <span class="fn">Tanu Kaskinen</span></a>
</span></b>
<pre>How does Zanata handle authorship tracking? We stopped using Transifex, because
it didn't any more provide separate patches for changes from different
translators (see <a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_RESOLVED bz_closed"
title="RESOLVED FIXED - Translation template are not updated on Transifex"
href="show_bug.cgi?id=45524">bug 45524</a>). Is Zanata any better? The updated po file in bug
101006 doesn't look encouraging: it looks like it contains changes from at
least three people, and no information about who changed what.
If Zanata doesn't track the authorship properly, we can't recommend using it.
It's open whether we will accept translations from Zanata at all (my personal
opinion is that we should accept them).</pre>
</div>
</p>
<hr>
<span>You are receiving this mail because:</span>
<ul>
<li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li>
<li>You are the QA Contact for the bug.</li>
</ul>
</body>
</html>