<html> <head> <base href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/"> </head> <body> <div> <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW - i18n: update French translation" href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=100962#c14">Comment # 14</a> on <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW - i18n: update French translation" href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=100962">bug 100962</a> from <a class="email" href="mailto:tanuk@iki.fi" title="Tanu Kaskinen <tanuk@iki.fi>"> Tanu Kaskinen</a> <pre>> Also, sorry about the dupe, it seems Yvan and I had the same idea at the > exact same time. I should have checked again before opening my bug report, > but what were the odds. No problem, I don't think you did anything wrong. As you said, this conflict was very unlikely. > For what it's worth, I don't think a detailed authorship > tracking is that important in translations, if at all. Maybe so, but if at all possible, I want to avoid creating reasons for legal concern for other people who distribute pulseaudio as part of their products. My initial reaction was perhaps too strong, though. It's not like the exact copyright holder can be reliably traced for 100% of the code either. As long as the translation patches contain information about everyone who contributed to that patch, I think that's good enough. Another point is that it's nice for the translators to be visible in commit stats. Did you make any changes to the translation you took from Fedora, by the way? If you did, your name and email address should be added to the file. You can submit a new version, or I can edit the file myself (I currently only know your email address, so you'll need to tell me your name).</pre> </div> <hr> You are receiving this mail because: <ul> <li>You are the QA Contact for the bug.</li> <li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li> </ul> </body> </html>