<html> <head> <base href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/"> </head> <body> <div> <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW - Peak meters are shown in the Recording/Playback tabs" href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=103535#c5">Comment # 5</a> on <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW - Peak meters are shown in the Recording/Playback tabs" href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=103535">bug 103535</a> from <a class="email" href="mailto:tanuk@iki.fi" title="Tanu Kaskinen <tanuk@iki.fi>"> Tanu Kaskinen</a> <pre>There seems to be some confusion here. In the initial report you said that on the local pavucontrol you see streams for every peak meter of a remote pavucontrol, but I don't think that is the case. I believe you're only seeing the streams of the tunnel sinks and tunnel sources. Those streams exist whether or not pavucontrol is running on the remote machine or not, and if you add new streams on the remote machine, no new streams should appear on the local pavucontrol. The tunnels don't adjust their sample rate depending on what rate applications are using, which is something that could be improved, but in the specific case of the 25 Hz streams created by pavucontrol, those will have to be resampled to a higher rate in any case, because otherwise pavucontrol would prevent other applications from using the tunnel devices with any reasonable rate (the device rate can't be updated when the device is being used). If you just want to hide the tunnel streams in pavucontrol, that's a reasonable request. I think the tunnel streams should count as virtual streams, which pavucontrol already has an option for filtering out.</pre> </div> <hr> You are receiving this mail because: <ul> <li>You are the QA Contact for the bug.</li> <li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li> </ul> </body> </html>