<html>
<head>
<base href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/">
</head>
<body><span class="vcard"><a class="email" href="mailto:tanuk@iki.fi" title="Tanu Kaskinen <tanuk@iki.fi>"> <span class="fn">Tanu Kaskinen</span></a>
</span> changed
<a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_RESOLVED bz_closed"
title="RESOLVED DUPLICATE - Build fails when libc provides memfd_create"
href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=104815">bug 104815</a>
<br>
<table border="1" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="8">
<tr>
<th>What</th>
<th>Removed</th>
<th>Added</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="text-align:right;">Status</td>
<td>NEW
</td>
<td>RESOLVED
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="text-align:right;">Resolution</td>
<td>---
</td>
<td>DUPLICATE
</td>
</tr></table>
<p>
<div>
<b><a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_RESOLVED bz_closed"
title="RESOLVED DUPLICATE - Build fails when libc provides memfd_create"
href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=104815#c2">Comment # 2</a>
on <a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_RESOLVED bz_closed"
title="RESOLVED DUPLICATE - Build fails when libc provides memfd_create"
href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=104815">bug 104815</a>
from <span class="vcard"><a class="email" href="mailto:tanuk@iki.fi" title="Tanu Kaskinen <tanuk@iki.fi>"> <span class="fn">Tanu Kaskinen</span></a>
</span></b>
<pre>Thanks for reporting! This is a duplicate of <a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_NEW "
title="NEW - memfd-wrappers.h : conflict with recent glibc"
href="show_bug.cgi?id=104733">bug 104733</a>, though. <a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_NEW "
title="NEW - memfd-wrappers.h : conflict with recent glibc"
href="show_bug.cgi?id=104733">Bug 104733</a> has
a patch too, which I think is slightly better in some ways than yours, but that
patch hasn't been tested with the new glibc version. Could you test it?
One difference between the two patches is that your patch passes "#include
<sys/mman.h>" to the AC_CHECK_FUNC call, which seemed like a good idea, but I
had a look at the autoconf manual, and AC_CHECK_FUNC doesn't actually take a
fourth parameter. AC_CHECK_FUNC primarily checks that the function is found
when linking, and I suppose the missing #include doesn't prevent linking from
working.
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of <a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_NEW "
title="NEW - memfd-wrappers.h : conflict with recent glibc"
href="show_bug.cgi?id=104733">bug 104733</a> ***</pre>
</div>
</p>
<hr>
<span>You are receiving this mail because:</span>
<ul>
<li>You are the QA Contact for the bug.</li>
<li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li>
</ul>
</body>
</html>